Immersion Chillers vs. Plate Chillers vs. Counterflow Chillers

Crafting your own beer is a thrilling journey, but every brewer knows that achieving the perfect temperature during the chilling process is crucial for a successful batch. When it comes to chilling wort, homebrewers have several options at their disposal, each with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. In this guide, we'll explore three popular chilling methods: immersion chillers, plate chillers, and counterflow chillers, highlighting their pros and cons, putting their cooling power to the test with an experiment, and telling you which is best (in our modest opinion) for homebrewing beer!

‍

‍

Introducing the Contestants!

Immersion Chillers:

Pros:

1. Simple Design: Immersion chillers are perhaps the most straightforward option. They consist of a coiled copper or stainless steel tube that is submerged directly into the wort.
2. Ease of Use: Operating an immersion chiller requires minimal setup and can be easily used by brewers of all experience levels.
3. Affordability: Compared to other chilling methods, immersion chillers are typically more budget-friendly, making them an attractive option for beginners or those on a tight budget.

Cons:

1. Slower Cooling: Typically immersion chillers can take longer to cool the wort compared to other methods, especially if the tap water temperature is high.
2. Limited Efficiency: Since immersion chillers rely solely on the surrounding liquid (usually tap water) for cooling, their efficiency can be affected by factors such as water temperature and flow rate.
3. Sanitation Concerns: Ensuring the cleanliness of the immersion chiller can be challenging, as it is exposed to the wort throughout the chilling process.

Plate Chillers:

Pros:

1. Efficiency: Plate chillers are highly efficient at rapidly reducing the temperature of wort due to their large surface area and counterflow design.
2. Compact Size: Plate chillers are typically smaller and more portable than other options, making them ideal for brewers with limited space.
3. Temperature Control: Plate chillers allow for precise temperature control, enabling brewers to achieve their desired pitching temperature quickly and consistently.

Cons:

1. Cleaning Challenges: Plate chillers have intricate internal channels that can be difficult to clean thoroughly, increasing the risk of contamination and off-flavors if not maintained properly.
2. Potential Clogging: The narrow channels of plate chillers are prone to clogging from hop debris and other particulates present in the wort, requiring regular maintenance and cleaning to prevent issues.
3. Higher Cost: Plate chillers tend to be more expensive upfront compared to immersion chillers, which may deter budget-conscious brewers.

Counterflow Chillers:

Pros:

1. Efficient Cooling: Counterflow chillers combine the rapid cooling of plate chillers with the simplicity of immersion chillers, offering excellent efficiency and performance.
2. Minimal Wort Exposure: Unlike immersion chillers, counterflow chillers minimize the exposure of wort to potential contaminants, enhancing the overall quality and stability of the beer.
3. Versatility: Counterflow chillers can handle varying flow rates and temperatures, providing brewers with greater flexibility and control over the chilling process.

Cons:

1. Complex Design: Counterflow chillers have a more intricate design compared to immersion chillers, which may require additional setup and maintenance.
2. Risk of Clogging: Similar to plate chillers, counterflow chillers can be susceptible to clogging from hop debris and other solids, necessitating regular cleaning and maintenance.
3. Higher Cost: Counterflow chillers are typically more expensive than immersion chillers, making them a significant investment for homebrewers, particularly those on a tight budget.

‍

The Experiment

To assess the cooling power of each unit we filled a brewzilla with 45L (11.9 gal) of water and heated it to 80°C (176°F), from here we gave each chiller 10 minutes to cool down the water as much as it could (obviously separately, and reheating the water between each test). Before taking a temperature reading (using both the base thermometer of the brewzilla and a separate thermometer) we gave the water a big mix using a mash paddle and allowed it to whirlpool for 10 seconds before measuring the temp, this helped to ensure an equal distribution of heat throughout the water, so that we weren't measuring hot or cold spots in the liquid that had yet to reach homeostasis.

‍

The Results

This may seem a rudimentary experiment, but often in science it is best to use Occam's razor to find an an answer, the problem-solving principle that recommends searching for explanations constructed with the smallest possible set of elements, and the same logic can be applied to finding the best way to construct an experiment. The least amount of variables possible to still find a definitive answer will yield the clearest results! Make sense? So, with all that said lets take a look at the results below!

‍

‍

I was pretty surprised! I entirely expected the plate chiller to come out on top, but in actuality the immersion chiller managed to cool the water 5°C (10.1%) more than the plate chiller, and a whopping 12.2°C (21.4%) more than the counterflow chiller!

‍

But Does Size Matter!?

Now with all this said and done, yes it is important to concede size does matter (sorry gents!), the more surface area contact with the liquid being cooled that a chiller has, the greater cooling power it will posses, so whilst this experiment is great at telling us which is "best" at cooling between these very commonly available homebrewing chillers, it must be remembered that if you used a much smaller immersion chiller, it would not have any where near the cooling power of the chiller we were using in this experiment. So if you take anything away from this at all, please just make sure you use a chiller that is of an appropriate size to your brewing system! and when in doubt, bigger is better!

So Which Chiller is The BEST?

When it comes down to it, this is entirely a personal preference for each brewer, each chilling method has its own set of advantages and drawbacks, and the best choice ultimately depends on your brewing setup, preferences, and budget. Immersion chillers offer simplicity and affordability, while plate chillers excel in efficiency and temperature control. Counterflow chillers strike a balance between the two, offering excellent performance with minimal wort exposure. Whichever option you choose, proper maintenance and sanitation are essential to ensure consistent and high-quality brews. Cheers to your next successful batch!

‍

Which is my Favourite?

So whilst I cant say which is the definitive best, I will say which is my personal favourite to use. The Plate Chiller! There is a reason it is the most commonly used design amongst commercial brewers! As long as its used correctly and you have adequate filtering before wort enters, you should have minimal issues with blockages, its incredibly compact which makes it the most space efficient of the 3, and you can clean the bejesus out of the thing! By using powerful caustics and acids you can make it an incredibly sterile environment before your fresh wort enters, making it my personal favorite chiller. Despite the fact it only took out the silver metal in my little experiment, I believe its pro's out whey its small performance deficient against my immersion chiller, so it still holds the gold in my heart!

‍